Espriex Business Model Competition 2017

Berikut adalah info lomba mengenai Espriex Business Model Competition 2017:

What is Espriex ?

We are the first and  the  largest business model competition in ASEAN, the world of entrepreneurship is waiting for the next business with an innovative business model

Espriex BMC ASEAN will be conducted next year in February, Stay tune on our website and don't forget to prepare your idea. Join the competition and represent ASEAN in International Business Model Competition in Harvard

Why ESPRIEX: ASEAN Business Model Competition?

ASEAN Business Model Competition represents an alternative for the entrepreneurship community. Competing in the ESPRIEX BMC will not only help you learn about this paradigm, it will also help you become a more successful entrepreneur and decrease the time it takes you to reach that success. The ESPRIEX BMC offers students the chance to win funding for their business idea. Invest a few hours into understanding Business Model Principles and your life as an entrepreneur will change forever.

JUDGING CRITERIA

Each round of the International Business Model Competition is generally judged using the following questions:

• Did the team use the Business Model Canvas or similar tool to identify and track assumptions?
• Did the team clearly state their assumptions/hypotheses?
• Did the team identify the most crucial assumptions to test first (the ones that will kill their  business)?
• Did the team design low cost, rapid, but reliable tests of these hypotheses?
• Did the team conduct the tests in a reliable manner?

1.  Number of tests – should be adjusted for industry, product type (web vs physical product),and business type (B2B vs B2C)
2. Quality of tests – interviews are high quality, surveys & focus groups are much lower quality (you don’t know which questions to ask) unless interviews have been conducted first

• Did the team clearly state what they learned, how it validated an assumption or not, and if thatinformed any changes/pivots?
• If changes were made, was the pivot the team made supported by evidence or did they fail to pivotwhen the evidence clearly stated it?
• If appropriate, has the team developed a prototype or minimum viable product (MVP)? Does theteam understand the assumptions they are testing with a prototype or MVP? Is the prototype or MVP appropriate to answer those assumptions? (We want to reward prototypes over full productsunless the product is the result of many prototypes tested with customers—in other words, wewant to reward testing assumptions before building and building from prototypes up to products.We do not want to reward just building products too early based on untested assumptions)

• Is the team solving a significant problem (defined in terms of money or impact)?*

• Does the team have significant evidence that the solution is validated (includes letters of intent, purchase contracts, sales, and partners)?*

* these criteria serve as tie breakers

  NOTE:Because web-based businesses are easier to test, these companies can often pivot faster. We tend to treat physical products, services, and web/software as slightly different categories in the judging, then pick the best of these categories to compete

Guideline, Timeline, more info: here

Contact: here